Distributed Energy Resources and Microgrids: The Growing Cybersecurity Threat Houston Businesses Must Address

The global push toward renewable energy has transformed how businesses and utilities generate, store, and distribute power. In Houston, where energy infrastructure is critical to both local and national interests, the integration of distributed energy resources (DER) such as solar panels, wind turbines, energy storage systems, and smart inverters has accelerated dramatically. While these technologies promise improved efficiency, cost savings, and environmental benefits, they also introduce serious cybersecurity vulnerabilities that most organizations are unprepared to handle.

A comprehensive September 2025 threat intelligence report from Dragos, Inc. titled “Global Electric: Distributed Energy Resources (DER) & Microgrids” reveals that adversaries – from sophisticated nation-state actors to opportunistic cybercriminals – are actively targeting the smart devices and microgrids that form the backbone of modern energy systems. The report documents real-world attacks and identifies critical vulnerabilities that affect everything from individual smart inverters to large-scale microgrid operations.

For Houston businesses investing in renewable energy infrastructure, understanding these threats and implementing proper defenses is no longer optional. The interconnected nature of distributed energy systems means a breach in one location can cascade through entire grid operations, causing widespread disruption, equipment damage, and potential safety hazards for personnel.

 Understanding the Threat Environment for Distributed Energy Resources

Distributed energy resources represent smaller, modular technologies for energy generation and storage that typically yield less than 10 megawatts of power. These include photovoltaic systems, wind turbines, battery storage, fuel cells, and various other generation technologies. The “smart” aspect of these systems—their ability to communicate, be remotely managed, and integrate with grid operations—is precisely what makes them vulnerable to cyber attacks.

Researchers and security firms have identified multiple real-world incidents demonstrating these vulnerabilities:

• A 2019 denial-of-service attack against a Utah-based renewable energy provider disrupted communications to a dozen generation sites, forcing operators to repeatedly test and deploy firewall updates to stop devices from rebooting
• A 2022 attack affecting German wind turbine management systems occurred during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, linked to the AcidRain wiper malware and attributed to the KAMACITE threat group
• A 2024 compromise of Japanese SolarView installations resulted in these systems being used for unauthorized bank transfers, marking the first known instance of attackers using DER technologies for command and control purposes
• Ongoing attacks against Lithuanian electric vehicle charging stations and photovoltaic monitoring systems by pro-Russia hacktivist groups demonstrate how renewable infrastructure has become a target for geopolitically motivated adversaries

What makes these incidents particularly concerning is that many attacks were either unintentional side effects of broader campaigns or conducted by relatively unsophisticated actors. The implications are clear: as more Houston businesses deploy distributed energy resources, the attack surface expands dramatically, and the potential for both targeted and opportunistic attacks increases proportionally.

 Critical Vulnerabilities in Smart Inverters and Microgrid Infrastructure

Security research has identified several attack vectors that adversaries can exploit, many requiring relatively minimal skill and effort. The interconnected nature of these systems means vulnerabilities in individual devices can threaten entire grid operations.

Device reconnaissance and enumeration present the first line of exposure:

• Attackers can easily discover IP addresses, MAC addresses, running services, and patch information for networked DER devices with minimal technical expertise
• This reconnaissance reveals which devices are vulnerable to known exploits based on publicly disclosed CVEs
• Hub flood attacks can force gateways into learning mode, allowing further enumeration of connected devices or previously unknown network segments
• The information gathered enables adversaries to characterize devices and research applicable exploits before launching attacks

Denial of service attacks can disrupt operations with straightforward techniques:

• Standard network flooding methods using Python and bash scripts force device responses within typical thresholds, preventing legitimate devices from maintaining established sessions
• Research shows latency increases of as little as 3 seconds can interrupt integrated grid support functions
• At scale, these attacks can cause cascading failures across interconnected systems
• The simplicity of execution means even low-skill attackers can launch disruptive campaigns

Man-in-the-middle attacks allow adversaries to intercept and alter critical operational data:

• Using pre-installed assessment software common to security testing, attackers can intercept DER client and device traffic
• Address Resolution Protocol poisoning techniques enable modification of traffic for tested devices
• Attackers can alter critical voltage settings, power output values, and safety parameters
• Systems may falsely communicate fault or maintenance conditions, causing microgrids to “island” repeatedly
• Complex safety scenarios emerge where maintenance personnel must carefully determine line conditions after control center reliability is compromised

Packet replay attacks enable attackers to bypass security controls:

• Recording, modifying, and retransmitting network sessions forces devices to behave in unintended and unpredictable manners
• Researchers successfully captured DC disconnect voltage setting requests and modified set points before retransmission
• Unauthenticated client-side scripts can bypass required credentials, with falsified commands being accepted by devices
• Modified values for phase voltage, DC voltages, current, and power can be sent to clients, falsifying the state of inverters within microgrids
• TCP connections show some resistance due to sequencing numbers dropping duplicate packets, highlighting the importance of protocol standardization

Firmware modification represents the most serious security threat:

• Tampering with firmware update files before loading them into devices can embed malicious code
• Well-funded and geopolitically motivated adversaries dedicate time and resources to developing successful modifications
• Modified firmware can hide command-and-control operations, expand botnet capabilities, or stage future strategic objectives
• Few products have mechanisms for determining firmware is genuine, with users having no way to detect tampering until devices behave abnormally
• Malicious firmware modifications can significantly damage devices and potentially harm interconnected equipment

Authentication weaknesses persist across many DER products:

• Research labs and disclosed vulnerabilities reveal instances where authentication mechanisms are transmitted in plaintext
• Some devices transmit encrypted credentials but expose device IDs and names in ways that allow easier enumeration of network segments
• Devices using industrial protocols for management may allow sensitive settings changes without any authentication
• It’s critical to restrict access to common industrial protocol ports, especially on sensitive charge controllers and battery management systems

The network architecture significantly affects attack effectiveness. Flat networks with no encryption make these attacks trivial to execute, while properly segmented networks with encryption require adversaries to penetrate multiple layers and maintain presence in ways that are more obvious to operators and defenders.

 The Houston Context: Why Local Businesses Are at Risk

Houston’s position as the energy capital of the United States makes it a high-value target for adversaries seeking to disrupt critical infrastructure. As local businesses adopt renewable energy to reduce costs, meet sustainability goals, or enhance energy resilience, they inadvertently become part of a larger interconnected system that adversaries can exploit.

The integration of residential and commercial renewable installations with utility grid operations creates complex attack scenarios:

• A Houston commercial facility installing a solar array with smart inverters connected to the local utility for net metering becomes part of grid operations
• Unpatched inverter vulnerabilities that become compromised as part of botnet campaigns can inject false data into grid balancing operations
• Compromised devices can force repeated disconnections that stress equipment and disrupt operations
• Real-time demand forecasting that operators rely on for grid stability can be undermined by falsified data
• Adversaries gain persistent footholds in connected infrastructure for future attacks

For small and medium-sized businesses in Katy and greater Houston, the challenge is particularly acute:

• These organizations often lack dedicated cybersecurity personnel with operational technology expertise
• Many businesses have no visibility into the security posture of their DER equipment
• Reliance on vendors who may not prioritize security in device design leaves gaps in protection
• Organizations frequently underestimate the potential impact of a successful attack on their operations
• The assumption that “we’re too small to be targeted” ignores the reality of automated scanning and opportunistic attacks

The reality facing Houston businesses is that cybersecurity for renewable energy infrastructure requires specialized knowledge that goes beyond traditional IT security. Understanding industrial protocols, grid integration requirements, safety systems, and the operational technology environment demands expertise that most managed IT support providers simply don’t possess.

 Real Consequences Beyond Theoretical Risks

The cybersecurity threats to distributed energy resources aren’t hypothetical scenarios—they have real operational, financial, and safety consequences that Houston businesses must consider seriously. The interconnected nature of modern energy systems means attacks that start small can have far-reaching effects.

Equipment damage and financial losses represent immediate tangible impacts:

• Maliciously altered settings can result in expensive repairs or complete device replacement
• Smart inverters operating outside safe parameters can suffer permanent damage
• Battery management systems with compromised firmware may charge or discharge in ways that degrade or destroy expensive storage equipment
• Warranty coverage may be voided if manufacturers determine equipment was operating outside specifications due to unauthorized modifications
• Downtime during repairs or replacement translates to lost production and revenue

Operational disruptions extend beyond individual facilities:

• When attackers inject false sensor data into grid operations, utilities make balancing decisions based on incorrect information
• Frequency instability can result from widespread data falsification across multiple DER installations
• Localized outages may occur as grid operators respond to what they perceive as equipment failures or dangerous conditions
• Repeated “islanding” events caused by malicious commands can prevent DER systems from providing intended backup power during actual grid disruptions
• Loss of visibility into DER operations means operators cannot effectively manage distributed resources during peak demand periods

Safety risks emerge as perhaps the most serious consequence:

• Altered voltage settings can create hazardous conditions for maintenance personnel who rely on accurate system information
• Falsified line condition reports can lead technicians to believe equipment is de-energized when it remains live
• Modified safety parameters may disable protective functions that prevent equipment from operating in dangerous states
• Physical harm to personnel working on equipment with compromised control systems represents an unacceptable risk

Cascading effects demonstrate the interconnected vulnerability:

• A compromised residential solar installation can affect grid operations that impact commercial facilities, hospitals, and critical infrastructure throughout the service area
• This “ripple effect” makes even seemingly minor vulnerabilities in consumer-grade equipment a concern for grid operators and large commercial facilities
• Attacks on clusters of devices may be disruptive, expensive, and potentially dangerous as devices feed power to the local grid based on maliciously altered set points
• The methodology of interconnectedness in microgrid architecture means an adversary attack may have far-reaching consequences, whether intentional or not

Regulatory and liability considerations add complexity to the threat environment:

• As DER integration with utility operations becomes standard practice, questions of responsibility for securing these devices remain largely unresolved
• If a Houston business’s compromised solar equipment contributes to grid instability or outages affecting other customers, potential legal exposure could be significant
• Cyber insurance policies may not cover incidents involving operational technology or may require specific security measures that many businesses haven’t implemented
• Regulatory requirements for DER security are evolving, with utilities potentially gaining authority to remove vulnerable assets from bidirectional infrastructure

The combination of these consequences makes cybersecurity for distributed energy resources a critical business issue that demands attention from executive leadership, not just IT departments.

 What Houston Businesses Need to Know About Securing DER Infrastructure

Effective security for distributed energy resources requires a multi-layered approach combining technical controls, operational practices, and vendor accountability. The complexity of these systems means generic IT security measures are insufficient—you need strategies specifically designed for operational technology environments.

Network segmentation and encrypted communications form the foundation of DER security:

• Properly segmented networks prevent adversaries from easily moving between corporate IT systems and operational technology controlling energy infrastructure
• End-to-end encryption for device communications can prevent many scanning and replay activities from accomplishing their objectives
• Even basic segmentation can elevate the difficulty level enough to deter less sophisticated attackers while providing defenders more opportunity to detect intrusion attempts
• Encryption may not deter more sophisticated adversaries entirely, but it requires additional steps that may attract the attention of security appliances and network defenders

Remote administration security must be prioritized for systems managing DER equipment:

• Discontinue legacy protocols like Telnet in favor of encrypted alternatives such as Secure Shell (SSH) when possible
• File transfer methods for updating firmware or moving logs should use File Transfer Protocol Secure, FTP over Secure Sockets Layer, or Secure Copy Protocol
• A host may be required because not all devices support secure protocols natively
• Multifactor authentication should protect any service used to access the internal network for administrative purposes
• Least privilege should be applied enterprise-wide to ensure only accounts tasked with administrative duties can perform them
• Administrative purpose accounts should not be used for routine activities like email or web browsing

Firewall rules and access controls provide essential protection:

• Firewall rules typically implemented for enterprise security will alleviate lesser technical denial-of-service attacks and possibly man-in-the-middle or packet replay attacks
• Ensuring MAC addresses are statically assigned to devices helps ensure unauthorized devices cannot connect and intercept traffic
• MAC spoofing may still circumvent this protection, requiring additional layers of security
• Blocking non-allow-listed devices from communicating within an environment helps ensure rogue devices cannot begin intercepting and capturing data

Zero Trust policies should be evaluated per environment and implemented when possible:

• Authentication portals should capture approval of external devices, whether via jump hosts or VPN appliances that allow only approved devices based on established authentication criteria
• Tools like remote desktop protocol should be avoided unless necessary, and if implemented, should follow CISA guidelines for securing remote access software
• This policy may assist in benign situations of users plugging in their devices without malicious intent but which may introduce security risks
• Zero Trust doesn’t mean zero access—it means verified access based on identity, device health, and context

Software inventories and patch management should be of paramount importance:

• A detailed record of devices by serial number and their associated software and version numbers assists administrators in tracking needs for security posture as vulnerabilities are discovered
• This allows administrators to correctly plan for patch cycles and any possible downtime necessary to secure devices when patches are released
• Understanding the deployment ensures that an adversary cannot exploit blind spots within an environment
• Coordination with vendors is essential, as operational technology patching often requires more careful testing and scheduling than IT system updates

Physical security considerations cannot be ignored in DER security strategies:

• Solar arrays, battery storage systems, and associated control equipment often sit in exposed locations that are difficult to monitor continuously
• Approximately 14% of known vulnerabilities affecting inverters require physical access to exploit
• Access controls, surveillance, and intrusion detection for equipment locations should be part of comprehensive security planning
• Personnel should be trained to recognize and report signs of tampering or unauthorized access to DER equipment

Implementing these security measures requires expertise in both cybersecurity and operational technology. For most Houston businesses, this means partnering with a managed services provider that understands the unique requirements of energy infrastructure security.

 The Vendor Responsibility Gap

One of the most significant challenges facing Houston businesses is that many DER device manufacturers have not prioritized security in product design and development. This creates a responsibility gap where businesses implementing renewable energy find themselves responsible for securing equipment that was never designed with security as a priority.

The current state of DER device security reveals concerning patterns:

• Devices continue to ship with insecure default configurations that leave wireless capabilities enabled without authentication
• Factory passwords that users rarely change remain common across products
• Communications protocols transmit sensitive data in plaintext, making interception trivial for attackers
• Firmware update mechanisms lack integrity verification, allowing potential tampering
• Limited or absent security testing and vulnerability disclosure processes mean problems aren’t identified and addressed proactively

Outdated security practices persist despite decades of cybersecurity knowledge:

• Device login and password handling routinely follows an antiquated methodology of insecure communication via browser and plaintext credential transmission
• Some devices load and decrypt modified firmware updates before rejecting illegitimate updates, revealing information about security mechanisms
• Legacy device integration is often prioritized over security, with arrays serving as staging points to attack older devices
• The rush to market with renewable technology has resulted in security being treated as an afterthought rather than a fundamental requirement

The lack of standardization across vendors creates additional challenges:

• Different devices from different manufacturers implement security controls inconsistently
• Protocol implementations vary, with some using TCP connections resistant to certain attacks while others use more vulnerable approaches
• Interoperability requirements sometimes conflict with security best practices, forcing compromises
• No consensus exists on security requirements for residential versus commercial versus utility-scale deployments

Organizations procuring DER equipment must demand better security from vendors:

• Require encrypted communications enabled by default, not as an optional configuration
• Insist on secure credential transmission and storage with no plaintext passwords
• Demand regular security updates and patches throughout the product lifecycle, with clear commitments on support duration
• Request documented security testing and vulnerability disclosure processes that demonstrate vendor commitment to security
• Evaluate integration support for enterprise security tools and monitoring systems before purchase
• Establish contractual security obligations that hold vendors accountable for discovered vulnerabilities

The community response must drive change in vendor practices:

• Trust and interoperability will be paramount going forward with any integrated energy resources
• Infrastructure operators have a unique opportunity to be at the forefront of ensuring DER technology is developed with interoperability and security in mind
• Established entities should use their reputations to work with vendors and ensure requirements are communicated so that new technologies are better prepared for live environments
• The Department of Energy should be urged to develop and mandate consolidated security standards to ensure vendors and asset operators have common baselines

Until vendors prioritize security in DER product development, businesses must assume devices ship with vulnerabilities and implement compensating controls. This reality makes working with experienced managed services providers essential, as these organizations can help identify security gaps and implement protection measures that vendors have neglected.

 How CinchOps Can Help Secure Your Energy Infrastructure

CinchOps brings decades of proven expertise in securing and managing operational technology environments, including extensive experience with the most complex energy infrastructure systems in the world. Our team members have led global development and deployment of advanced grid management platforms serving the largest power generation, transmission, and distribution providers, including CenterPoint Energy right here in Houston.

This real-world experience in managing critical infrastructure at scale – from supervisory control and data acquisition systems to energy management platforms, distribution automation, outage management, and renewable energy integration systems – positions us uniquely to understand the challenges Houston businesses face as they adopt distributed energy resources.

When you partner with CinchOps for managed IT support, you gain access to professionals who understand both information technology security and the operational technology requirements of energy systems. Our comprehensive cybersecurity services include:

• Operational Technology Security Assessments evaluating your distributed energy resources, smart inverters, battery management systems, and associated network infrastructure to identify vulnerabilities before adversaries can exploit them
• Network Segmentation and Architecture Review ensuring your DER devices are properly isolated from corporate networks while maintaining necessary operational connectivity, with encrypted communications and proper access controls
• 24/7 Security Monitoring specifically designed for industrial and operational technology environments, detecting anomalous behavior in DER communications, unauthorized configuration changes, and potential attack indicators that generic IT security tools miss
• Patch Management and Firmware Updates for operational technology devices, coordinating with vendors and carefully testing updates before deployment to avoid operational disruptions while closing security gaps
• Incident Response Planning and Execution tailored to scenarios involving compromised energy infrastructure, including coordination with utilities, regulatory notification, and recovery procedures that prioritize safety and operational continuity
• Vendor Security Requirements and Procurement Support helping you evaluate DER equipment from a security perspective before purchase, establishing contractual security obligations, and ensuring vendors meet ongoing security commitments
• Regulatory Compliance Assistance navigating the evolving requirements for DER security, including NERC CIP considerations for facilities that interconnect with bulk electric systems, and documentation required for cyber insurance coverage
• Training and Awareness Programs educating your operations and facilities personnel on the specific security considerations for distributed energy resources, recognizing potential compromise indicators, and following proper protocols when issues arise

For Houston businesses implementing renewable energy as part of sustainability initiatives, cost reduction strategies, or resilience planning, security cannot be an afterthought. The threats are real, the vulnerabilities are known, and adversaries are actively targeting this infrastructure. CinchOps provides the expertise you need to deploy distributed energy resources confidently, knowing your systems are protected by professionals who understand both the energy sector and cybersecurity at the deepest levels.

Contact us today to discuss how we can help secure your renewable energy investments and protect your operations from the growing threats targeting distributed energy resources.

 Discover More 

Discover more about our enterprise-grade and business protecting cybersecurity services: CinchOps Cybersecurity
Discover related topics: SixMap Study Reveals Critical Cybersecurity Gaps in US Energy Sector
For Additional Information on this topic: Dragos sounds alarm over cyberattacks targeting distributed energy and industrial microgrids

FREE CYBERSECURITY ASSESSMENT