Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026

The same technology reshaping attacks is now embedded in most defenses.

94% of respondents named AI the biggest driver of change in cybersecurity, and 87% said AI-related vulnerabilities were the fastest-growing risk through 2025. Meanwhile 77% of organizations have already put AI to work defending themselves.

Attackers use AI to mass-produce convincing phishing, deepfake audio and video, and forged documents that slip past the checks a person would normally make. Defenders use it right back - 52% for phishing detection, 46% for intrusion response, 40% for user-behavior analytics. The catch for a smaller shop is the skills line: 54% of organizations cite insufficient knowledge as the main obstacle to adopting AI-driven security. In 35 years doing this, I have never seen a technology arm both sides so fast, and the side with a security team wins that race by default.

• Assessment is finally catching up. Organizations that vet AI tools before deployment nearly doubled, from 37% in 2025 to 64% in 2026.
• The new top worry is leakage. Data leaks through generative AI (34%) and stronger adversarial capability (29%) lead the 2026 concern list.
• Localization makes lures worse. AI now translates and localizes social engineering, so impersonations read as culturally authentic and harder to catch.

The threat that reaches the owner directly, not just the network.

73% of respondents said they or someone in their network was personally hit by cyber-enabled fraud in the past year, and 77% reported an overall increase. North America ranks second globally for exposure to digital scams at 79%.

CEOs moved cyber-enabled fraud and phishing to the top of their concern list for 2026, bumping ransomware from the spot it held in 2025. The three most common attack types were phishing, vishing, and smishing (62%), invoice or payment fraud (37%), and identity theft (32%). Invoice fraud is the one that quietly drains Houston businesses - a spoofed email redirecting a wire transfer costs a construction firm or engineering practice real money before anyone notices. We see the pattern often enough that "verify payment changes by phone" is now the first thing we tell a new client. Deepfakes make it worse: the report cites fabricated videos of public figures used to swindle victims, which means voice and video are no longer proof of anything.

Geopolitics, supply chains, and skills all point back to one divide.

65% of large companies now name third-party and supply chain vulnerabilities their greatest challenge, up from 54% a year earlier. But the number that matters for a 40-person Houston firm is different: small organizations are twice as likely to report insufficient resilience as large ones.

The report ties three threads together, and they all lead to the same place. Geopolitical volatility is now a mainstream concern, with 64% of organizations factoring nation-state motivated attacks into their risk planning and Houston's energy and manufacturing base squarely in scope. Supply chain risk keeps climbing, yet only 33% of organizations fully map their ecosystem and just 27% run recovery exercises with partners. And the skills shortage that underpins both is worst where budgets are thinnest. Attackers know this - they target the least-protected partner to reach the high-value one downstream, which is exactly why a small Houston vendor to a larger enterprise is a target whether it feels like one or not.

What separates the resilient from the exposed is not budget alone - it is governance and process. 99% of highly resilient organizations report board involvement in cybersecurity, 78% have the skills they need (against 15% of under-resilient peers), and 83% assess AI tool security before deployment. None of that requires an enterprise to pull off. It requires someone whose job is to run it.